Tuesday, 19 March 2013

Hinkley Point, Somerset, and Winfrith, Dorset.




Photo Source: Wikipedia


For consideration, something relevant I found online:

On Winfrith 1958-1990

 “In two to three years we’ve reduced part of the site from something that would kill you in a few hours to somewhere you can walk through in safety”, Andy Staples, Womad (Winfrith Operations Maintenance and Decommissioning), BBC News Online, 30 April, 2004.


What should we say about Winfrith?

About the Steam Generating Heavy Water Nuclear Reactor,
The plutonium laboratories on Egdon Heath?

Should we rejoice
That the decommissioning and clean-up costs
And the allocations have been drastically cut?
Just two more reactors to go!

Thirty five years have been saved, it’s claimed,
As well as 300 million pounds-
Thanks to a change in the ‘discount’ rate,
The revised financial rules

The Nuclear Directorate states that it “will seek to focus a proportionate level of regulatory attention on ensuring the continued safety of higher-hazard facilites.”

Comforting news.
Roll on 2020, roll on 2050!

Someone should preach about Purbeck,
About what’s been lost in the rivers,
About the impact on wildlife and habitat;
About liquid radioactive waste
Dumped in Weymouth Bay,
Offshore of Arish Mell:
About plans to restore the environment,
About the contaminated, hazardous heath.

Winfrith Newburgh, East Burton and Wool.

While there’s talk of national affordability and competing priorities,
We all get a gamma dose.

Is it safe to consume crustaceans,
To eat fresh fish or molluscs?
The public’s exposure to radiation
At least is only ALARA:
“As Low as Reasonably Achievable”.

Are you listening?
 I’m gonna get me a Geiger counter,
And a sodium iodide scintillation counter.

Poole Harbour contains radioactivity from Winfrith’s liquid discharges 
and there is potential washout of gaseous discharges entering via the River Frome.”

Scintillating news.

No comments:

Post a Comment